Larry Edelson -

UN and PBOC Call For Dollar To Be Replaced By Single World Currency

by Larry Edelson on March 26, 2009

It’s starting, just like I predicted it would over 10 years ago. And it’s on time. By 2011 — which I have pointed out several times, is what I call a ‘panic cycle’ year in the currency markets — the dollar should be gone as a reserve currency.

 

See articles below, both the U.N. and the PBOC are now calling for the dollar to be replaced. — Larry

 

U.N. Will Recommend that the World Should Ditch the Dollar

By Jeremy Gaunt, Special to Salem-News.com

 

UN Currency specialist Avinash Persaud has long argued that the dollar would give way to the Chinese yuan as a global reserve currency within decades.

 

(LUXEMBOURG (Reuters) ) — A U.N. panel will next week recommend that the world ditch the dollar as its reserve currency in favor of a shared basket of currencies, a member of the panel said on Wednesday, adding to pressure on the dollar.

 

Currency specialist Avinash Persaud, a member of the panel of experts, told a Reuters Funds Summit in Luxembourg that the proposal was to create something like the old Ecu, or European currency unit, that was a hard-traded, weighted basket.

 

Persaud, chairman of consultants Intelligence Capital and a former currency chief at JPMorgan, said the recommendation would be one of a number delivered to the United Nations on March 25 by the U.N. Commission of Experts on International Financial Reform.

 

“It is a good moment to move to a shared reserve currency,” he said.

 

Central banks hold their reserves in a variety of currencies and gold, but the dollar has dominated as the most convincing store of value — though its rate has wavered in recent years as the United States ran up huge twin budget and external deficits.

 

Some analysts said news of the U.N. panel’s recommendation extended dollar losses because it fed into concerns about the future of the greenback as the main global reserve currency, raising the chances of central bank sales of dollar holdings.

 

“Speculation that major central banks would begin rebalancing their FX reserves has risen since the intensification of the dollar’s slide between 2002 and mid-2008,” CMC Markets said in a note.

 

Russia is also planning to propose the creation of a new reserve currency, to be issued by international financial institutions, at the April G20 meeting, according to the text of its proposals published on Monday.

 

It has significantly reduced the dollar’s share in its own reserves in recent years.

 

Good Time

 

Persaud said that the United States was concerned that holding the reserve currency made it impossible to run policy, while the rest of world was also unhappy with the generally declining dollar.

 

“There is a moment that can be grasped for change,” he said.

 

“Today the Americans complain that when the world wants to save, it means a deficit. A shared (reserve) would reduce the possibility of global imbalances.”

 

Persaud said the panel had been looking at using something like an expanded Special Drawing Right, originally created by the International Monetary Fund in 1969 but now used mainly as an accounting unit within similar organizations.

 

The SDR and the old Ecu are essentially combinations of currencies, weighted to a constituent’s economic clout, which can be valued against other currencies and indeed against those inside the basket.

 

Persaud said there were two main reasons why policymakers might consider such a move, one being the current desire for a change from the dollar.

 

The other reason, he said, was the success of the euro, which incorporated a number of currencies but roughly speaking held on to the stability of the old German deutschemark compared with, say, the Greek drachma.

 

Persaud has long argued that the dollar would give way to the Chinese yuan as a global reserve currency within decades.

 

A shared reserve currency might negate this move, he said, but he believed that China would still like to take on the role.

 

Special thanks to Jeremy Gaunt, European Investment Correspondent, for this report. (editing by Patrick Graham)

 

 

China Takes Aim at Dollar

By Andrew Batson

 

BEIJING (WALL STREET JOURNAL) — China called for the creation of a new currency to eventually replace the dollar as the world’s standard, proposing a sweeping overhaul of global finance that reflects developing nations’ growing unhappiness with the U.S. role in the world economy.

 

The unusual proposal, made by central bank governor Zhou Xiaochuan in an essay released Monday in Beijing, is part of China’s increasingly assertive approach to shaping the global response to the financial crisis.

 

David Semple of Van Eck Emerging Markets Fund outlines opportunities in China’s real-estate and retail sectors, along with greater stability in Russia. But the situation in Eastern Europe is still uncertain. Polya Lesova reports.

 

Mr. Zhou’s proposal comes amid preparations for a summit of the world’s industrial and developing nations, the Group of 20, in London next week. At past such meetings, developed nations have criticized China’s economic and currency policies.

 

This time, China is on the offensive, backed by other emerging economies such as Russia in making clear they want a global economic order less dominated by the U.S. and other wealthy nations.

 

However, the technical and political hurdles to implementing China’s recommendation are enormous, so even if backed by other nations, the proposal is unlikely to change the dollar’s role in the short term. Central banks around the world hold more U.S. dollars and dollar securities than they do assets denominated in any other individual foreign currency. Such reserves can be used to stabilize the value of the central banks’ domestic currencies.

 

Monday’s proposal follows a similar one Russia made this month during preparations for the G20 meeting. Like China, Russia recommended that the International Monetary Fund might issue the currency, and emphasized the need to update “the obsolescent unipolar world economic order.”

 

dollar-dominated-2 UN and PBOC Call For Dollar To Be Replaced By Single World CurrencyChinese officials are frustrated at their financial dependence on the U.S., with Premier Wen Jiabao this month publicly expressing “worries” over China’s significant holdings of U.S. government bonds. The size of those holdings means the value of the national rainy-day fund is mainly driven by factors China has little control over, such as fluctuations in the value of the dollar and changes in U.S. economic policies. While Chinese banks have weathered the global downturn and continue to lend, the collapse in demand for the nation’s exports has shuttered factories and left millions jobless.

 

In his paper, published in Chinese and English on the central bank’s Web site, Mr. Zhou argued for reducing the dominance of a few individual currencies, such as the dollar, euro and yen, in international trade and finance. Most nations concentrate their assets in those reserve currencies, which exaggerates the size of flows and makes financial systems overall more volatile, Mr. Zhou said.

 

Moving to a reserve currency that belongs to no individual nation would make it easier for all nations to manage their economies better, he argued, because it would give the reserve-currency nations more freedom to shift monetary policy and exchange rates. It could also be the basis for a more equitable way of financing the IMF, Mr. Zhou added. China is among several nations under pressure to pony up extra cash to help the IMF.

 

John Lipsky, the IMF’s deputy managing director, said the Chinese proposal should be treated seriously. “It reflects officials’ concerns about improving the stability of the financial system,” he said. “It’s interesting because of China’s unique position, and because the governor put it in a measured and considered way.”

 

China’s proposal is likely to have significant implications, said Eswar Prasad, a professor of trade policy at Cornell University and former IMF official. “Nobody believes that this is the perfect solution, but by putting this on the table the Chinese have redefined the debate,” he said. “It represents a very strong pushback by China on a number of fronts where they feel themselves being pushed around by the advanced countries,” such as currency policy and funding for the IMF.

 

A spokeswoman for the U.S. Treasury Department declined to comment on Mr. Zhou’s views. In recent weeks, senior Obama administration officials have sought to reassure Beijing that the current U.S. spending spree is a short-term effort to restart the stalled American economy, not evidence of long-term U.S. profligacy.

 

“The re-establishment of a new and widely accepted reserve currency with a stable valuation benchmark may take a long time,” Mr. Zhou said. In remarks earlier Monday, one of his deputies, Hu Xiaolian, also said the dollar’s dominant position in international trade and investment is unlikely to change soon. Ms. Hu is in charge of reserve management as the head of China’s State Administration of Foreign Exchange.

 

Mr. Zhou’s comments — coming on the heels of Mr. Wen’s musing about the safety of China’s dollar holdings — appear to be a warning to the U.S. that it can’t expect China to finance its spending indefinitely.

 

haves-and-haves-not UN and PBOC Call For Dollar To Be Replaced By Single World CurrencyThe central banker’s proposal reflects both China’s desire to hold its $1.95 trillion in reserves in something other than U.S. dollars and the fact that Beijing has few alternatives. With more U.S. dollars continuing to pour into China from trade and investment, Beijing has no realistic option other than storing them in U.S. debt.

 

Mr. Zhou argued, without mentioning the dollar by name, that the loss of the dollar’s de facto reserve status would benefit the U.S. by avoiding future crises. Because other nations continued to park their money in U.S. dollars, the argument goes, the Federal Reserve was able to pursue an irresponsible policy in recent years, keeping interest rates too low for too long and thereby helping to inflate a bubble in the housing market.

 

“The outbreak of the crisis and its spillover to the entire world reflected the inherent vulnerabilities and systemic risks in the existing international monetary system,” Mr. Zhou said. The increasing number and intensity of financial crises suggests “the costs of such a system to the world may have exceeded its benefits.”

 

Mr. Zhou isn’t the first to make that argument. “The dollar reserve system is part of the problem,” Joseph Stiglitz, the Columbia University economist, said in a speech in Shanghai last week, because it meant so much of the world’s cash was funneled into the U.S. “We need a global reserve system,” he said in the speech.

 

Mr. Zhou’s idea is to expand the use of “special drawing rights,” or SDRs — a kind of synthetic currency created by the IMF in the 1960s. Its value is determined by a basket of major currencies. Originally, the SDR was intended to serve as a shared currency for international reserves, though that aspect never really got off the ground.

 

These days, the SDR is mainly used in the IMF’s accounting for its transactions with member nations. Mr. Zhou suggested countries could increase their contributions to the IMF in exchange for greater access to a pool of reserves in SDRs.

 

Holding more international reserves in SDRs would increase the role and powers of the IMF. That indicates China and other developing nations aren’t hostile to international financial institutions — they just want to have more say in running them. China has resisted the U.S. push to make an immediate loan to the IMF because that wouldn’t give China a bigger vote. Ms. Hu said Monday that China, which encourages the IMF to explore other fund-raising options, would consider buying into a bond issue.

 

The IMF has been working on a proposal to issue bonds, probably only to central banks. Bond purchases are one way for the organization to raise money and meet its goal of at least doubling its lending war chest to $500 billion from $250 billion. Japan has loaned the IMF $100 billion and the European Union has pledged another $100 billion.

(Terence Poon in Beijing, James T. Areddy in Shanghai, and Bob Davis and Michael M. Phillips in Washington contributed to this article.)

Related Posts

{ 8 comments… read them below or add one }

Tony Stewart 03.29.09 at 11:02 am

Hi. I just read your incredibly accurate “The G-20’s Secret Debt Solution,” written before the November G-20 meeting. It sounds like it could be the headline for this week’s meeting. My question is, however, if monetizing, say 20% of the debt, could cause one current US dollar to be worth 12 new ones, and that gold may go to $10,000 per oz., wouldn’t a person end up better off keeping their dollars instead of trading them in for gold? Thanks much.

Tony

Larry Edelson Reply:

No. They’d be worth a fraction of what they are now. One-tenth to one-twelfth.

Jay Ferris 04.02.09 at 8:22 am

Dear Larry,

Perhaps I’m jumping the gun just a little here, but I really appreciate your most recent article, “A Sneak Peak at the Future,” 4/2. I think the comment that I want to make in that connection would apply equally well here:

While you use the word “reflation,”, a good word for the immediate future, your thinking appears to me to still be a little bit paper bound. No one seems to have bothered with recalculating the money supply to include credit card debt. We have been on a “debt money” standard, backed by real estate equity for quite a while now, so that in effect, when real estate equity collapsed, there was a tremendous reduction in the money supply - everything else being equal, very deflationary, and as it was/is, the deflation was compounded by the reduction in the velocity of money as well. On the asset collapse side of the equation, there had also been the constantly increasing asset value of the real estate that supercharged the credit card component of the money supply. Taking all this together, I wish I had a handle on the size of the de facto contraction of the money supply, when the real estate version of the Federal Reserve went bust.

Larry Edelson Reply:

Yes, it’s a massive contraction. But that doesn’t mean it can’t expand again. In fact, for every $1 the Fed is putting into the system, another $8 to $10 will be eventually created through fractional reserve lending. The Fed has already committed to $14 trillion in promises, guaranteeing almost anything. Highly inflationary longer-term, as it removes almost all risk from the marketplace.

Jay Ferris 04.02.09 at 10:07 am

Dear Larry,

While we’re waiting moderation on that last, here is a further thought on the subject of “reflation.”

We need to keep a very close eye on “all the kings horses and all the kings men,” as they go about the business of “reflation.”
“debtflation” is replaced by paperflation/”reflation,” the “reflation” of real estate will get to a point of re-energizing the credit card component of the money supply, and that will supplement the paper “reflation.” That could prove to be a very volatile event, something like reaching “critical mass.” The question at that point for “all the kings horses and all the kings men”: will be can they control the reactor.

We sure wouldn’t want to see the US Treasury’s version of “chicken Kiev!”

Larry Edelson Reply:

Agreed!

Tom Lee 04.03.09 at 9:01 am

Hi Larry,
After having read this article and your article “A Sneak Peek at the Future”, and your article last fall “The G-20’s Secret Debt Solution” my mind is a whirl-wind. I have lot’s of questions, but your time is limited so I’ll focus on a narrow area. What happens to the value of loans when the monetizing occurs? If a person has a mortgage of $100,000, what will the bank say you owe after monetizing? If the loan amount stays at the $100,000 amount, then it is easy for me to see how the new inflate currency will make the pay-off easier. If the loan amount inflates too, I start having problems seeing the benefit.
Thanks for taking time to answer.
Tom

Larry Edelson Reply:

The loan remains the same. Asset prices rises relative to the debt.

Stacy LaCombe 04.05.09 at 5:40 pm

Hey Larry,

I joined your Real Wealth Report a couple of months ago. What an awesome tool! Thank you for you insights. Thanks also for the Uncommon Wisdom reports. Great site! Between the two I feel like I have a better handle on things to come.

I have 2 questions. The first question is regarding this bear market rally we are currently experiencing. You wrote that your indicators are telling you we may see this rally continue for the next couple of months with the chance of hitting 10k on the Dow. Most of the buys that we seem to be placing are weighted towards the metals and energy stocks. Is there a reason that we don’t go a little more bullish with ETF’s that follow the trends that you are forecasting. Second, are you of the belief that once we hit the 10K mark we are most likely headed back down to the 5k area on the Dow.

Thanks for you comments.

Larry Edelson Reply:

I do plan on recommending more ETFs in the near future. So stay tuned. Once this rally is complete, I do expect another downdraft. But at this time, I do not expect Dow 5,000.

Pranjay Kaushal 04.29.09 at 2:09 am

I have read your previous blogs and admire your comprehension of the global macro-economic environment, however I have few questions:-

1) If the dollar is devalued strongly as has been done a few times before, the things will surely improve for the US, however that would make the exports from other economies uncompetitive and in that scenario they would also have to devalue their currencies more than or equivalent to the dollar devaluation. This would cause more money-supply, hyper-inflation and therefore huge surge in commodity prices again causing severe recession. Is it therefore sensible to do dollar devaluation in such a globalized world environment unlike previous situations when it was polarized towards US?
2) If anyway the dollar devaluation is going to happen, what would be the criteria and process for calculation of the percentage of dollar devaluation, as the analysis of the impact would only be post-facto, which econometric models are usually used?

Larry Edelson Reply:

It would be largely centered on the dollar, as without the U.S., the rest of the world is toast. But more importantly, the world would then have to switch to a new monetary regime of some sort to avoid the outcome you speak of. As for the percentage devaluation, it’s hard to say. But overall debt levels would be a factor.

Jay 05.11.09 at 12:28 pm

Hi Larry, what do you think about China’s recent activities in Jamaica, where they loaned Jamaica money at reasonably attractive terms and negotiated to buy a large portion of Jamaica’s bauxite (raw material for Aluminum) production over several years? China is doing similar long term basic raw materials deals in Latin America, Africa, and Asia…

And, how do you see all that and China’s interest in a greater role in the IMF in terms of its global role aspirations?
Thanks.

I took your earlier recommendations on FXI and DIA and both are up significantly. Thanks!
All the best, Jay

Larry Edelson Reply:

No surprise on China. They are scouring the globe to secure natural resources.

scoot 09.15.09 at 10:24 am

Been reading some of the info and trying to figure out what the real estate market will be doing. I have a home for sale in the Denver area and want to sell at the right time. The question is whether to hold on for a while and hope for some recovery, or sell now at a reduced price to get out of the market before things take a dive. To sell, or not to sell, - that is the question…
Thanks for any info, Scoot

Leave a Comment

You can use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

I agree to the Terms and Conditions of this blog.